ISSN (Print): 2229-5828 editor@njet.org

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

The NIET Journal of Engineering and Technology (NJET) is committed to maintaining the integrity and credibility of the scientific record. Authors are expected to uphold the highest ethical standards in the preparation and submission of their manuscripts.

1. Originality and Redundant Publication

2. Research Integrity

Note: NJET uses plagiarism detection software to screen all submissions.

3. Use of Tools, Scales, and Third-Party Materials

Authors are responsible for securing the appropriate permissions for using any proprietary software, questionnaires, surveys, or measurement scales.

4. Citation Ethics

5. Avoidance of Harmful Content

Authors must avoid defamatory content, unsubstantiated allegations, or descriptions that may harm individuals or organizations. Research that may be misused (e.g., for biological harm or national security threats) must include appropriate warnings.

6. Authorship and Author Changes

7. Data Access and Validation

Authors should be prepared to provide raw data, records, or supporting documentation upon request to verify the accuracy of their results. Confidential or proprietary information may be exempted.

8. Ethical Misconduct and Investigation

In case of suspected ethical breaches (e.g., plagiarism, data manipulation, authorship disputes), NJET will follow COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines. Depending on the severity:

9. Correction of Fundamental Errors

Authors are obligated to notify the journal promptly if significant errors or inaccuracies are discovered post-publication. Based on the severity, NJET will issue either a correction notice or a retraction, ensuring transparency on the affected sections.

10. Suggesting or Excluding Reviewers

Authors may suggest or request the exclusion of specific reviewers. Suggested reviewers must be independent and not have any conflict of interest. Institutional email addresses must be provided for verification. While NJET is not obliged to follow reviewer suggestions, they are welcomed to aid in the peer review process.

← Back to all policies